|
|
| ITSMA E-ZINE |
August 2006 |
 |
| IN THIS ISSUE |
| Editor's Note: Revisiting Your
Marketing Communications "Audience Allocations" |
| What's Hot: A New Approach to Marketing and Sales Collaboration |
| The Interview: Creating Community: An Interview
with Communispace's Siobhan Dullea |
| On the Job: Avaya's Customer Councils: Achieving
C-Level Success |
EuroNotes: A Farewell Message from Bev Burgess |
| Moving to Solutions: Measuring Solutions Value:
Is It a Headache for You, Too? |
| Research Desk: Delving into Differentiation |
| Upcoming Events: |
- Lessons from Other IndustriesSeptember 13 Inner Circle
Meeting
- Marketing and Sales: A New PartnershipSeptember 19 Web
Briefing
- Blogs and Beyond: Marketing in the New Digital ChannelsSeptember
21 Workshop
- Micro- and Account-Based MarketingSeptember 26 Lunch
Briefing
- Marketing Investment Priorities and Trade-offsSeptember
27 Executive Roundtable
- Driving Value: ITSMA's 2006 Marketing ConferenceNovember
15-16 Conference
|
| Subscription Information |
| Please forward this ITSMA E-ZINE to
interested colleagues. |
[TOP
OF PAGE]
Editor's Notebook: Revisiting
Your Marketing Communications "Audience Allocations"
With September looming on the horizon, many ITSMA members are actively
involved in planning for 2007. As you get deeper into planning mode,
I urge you to take a moment to analyze how your budget is currently being
spent across your company's audience of customers, prospects, influencers,
and others—and to consider making a few changes.
According to data we collected for our 2006
Budget Study, the vast majority of spending is concentrated on
customers and prospects, with 39% of the budget going toward customers
and 34% to prospects. Only 10% of the budget is spent on influencing
the influencers, 7% on employees, 6% on partners, and 2% on investors.

In terms of reallocation, as direct marketing efforts become less effective
and buyers in general become more skeptical of company claims, it seems
wise to invest more in market influencers, whose messages often have
a bigger impact on your customers and prospects than you do. Second,
remember that it's your front-line employees who keep your existing customers
happy and loyal, so be sure that you're investing appropriately in keeping
them up to speed on the latest company news, messaging, and priorities.
Also remember that your existing customersnot your prospectsaccount
for a large portion of your new business; some of the dollars that are
currently being spent on prospects could probably have a bigger impact
somewhere else.
Rob Leavitt

[TOP OF PAGE]
What's
Hot: A New Approach to Marketing and Sales Collaboration
The lack of alignment between marketing and sales in the technology
industry is nothing new. Different goals, different timelines, different
cultures, and not enough appreciation of how both sides contribute to
the business have long undercut a truly integrated approach to sustainable
growth.
Although both sides have often bemoaned the "marketing is from Mars,
sales is from Venus" disconnect, the traditional approach to closing
the gap reflects an outdated view of marketing and sales priorities.
If companies are anxious to get the two functions working together more
effectively, they need to take a fresh look at both the problem and the
solution.
The typical approach to marketing-sales alignment emphasizes getting
marketing closer to sales through initiatives such as tighter alignment
of marketing activities with the sales cycle, better coordination around
demand generation and lead management, and allowing sales to have more
input into marketing programs and materials. These types of initiatives
certainly can be useful, but they risk reinforcing the standard industry
view that marketing is ultimately the junior partner of sales and that
the alignment problem is mainly one of marketers straying too far from
the daily and quarterly demands of the sales force.
The reality is that dramatic shifts in the nature of customers, competitors,
offerings, and market influencers are placing new demands on both marketing
and sales organizations, and both sides must change if they are to succeed.
Successful alignment today is not about marketing being a better junior
partner; it's about greater collaboration on shared priorities within
a much more complex customer environment.
For starters, both marketing and sales must provide substantial input
to help companies address some of their most important questions, including:
- Which market segments provide the greatest opportunities?
- Which offering areas deserve priority investment?
- Which partners can best contribute to near- and longer-term growth?
- How can we best strengthen relationships with key clients and key
executives?
Second, today's longer and more elaborate purchase processes means that
marketing can no longer focus just on brand and lead generation and then
rely on sales to do the rest; neither can the sales folks simply take
leads (even the most qualified ones) and bring them to a close on their
own. Instead, marketing needs to not only support sales through the cycle
but to actively develop programs and campaigns that engage customers,
deepen conversations, and enhance relationships every step of the way.
Finally, the ever-faster rate of change in the marketplace puts greater
stress on both sides, not only to "align" programs and strategies in
some initial planning phase, but to continuously adjust them in synch
to ensure ongoing coordination as company priorities adapt to new challenges
and opportunities.
As the pressure to perform continues to mount on both marketing and
sales, the benefits of greater collaboration are tantalizingly clear:
- Improved market and segment focus
- More compelling offerings
- Shorter and less expensive sales cycles
- More satisfied and loyal customers
If the two sides are indeed to collaborate more effectively, they must
focus on the practical challenges of working together on some the newer
priorities for marketplace success. Four of these newer priorities are:
- Account-based marketing (ABM). As companies look to generate
more business from their key accounts, ABM is gaining attention as
a critical initiative. By definition, developing marketing programs
for individual key accounts requires intensive collaboration between
marketers and sales account teams. Although the main goals for ABM
are typically to improve revenue, profit, positioning, and/or relationships
within the accounts, the side benefits of bringing sales and marketing
together in a priority area for the business are substantial as well.
- Reference management. Skeptical buyers, analysts, journalists,
and others continue to elevate their demands for provider proof. Not
surprisingly, reference programs have moved to the forefront in recent
years as critical support systems for both marketing and sales. Making
them robust and flexible enough to enable the right reference at the
right time in the right format, however, requires much greater marketing
and sales collaboration than has usually been the case.
- Executive relationship development. Technology and services
firms today all see the need to strengthen relationships with senior
executives to win larger deals and improve client loyalty. Meanwhile,
they also need their clients to help them understand new opportunities,
develop new solutions, and minimize marketplace mistakes. Systematically
improving the quality and quantity of executive relationships requires
deep and sustained collaboration between marketing and sales.
- Consultative and solutions sales training. As companies focus
more on upgrading the ability of their sales forces to sell higher-value
solutions to more senior business buyers, they are bumping into the
limits of traditional sales training. Marketing organizations potentially
have a major role to play in complementing the generic skills development
with the specific market, competitive, and business insight necessary
to support effective solutions selling.
Doubtless there are other initiatives that can help close the gap. Simply
putting marketing and sales people in each others' shoes more often—for
example, through joint planning, job rotations, or even more physical
colocation—can be a huge help. Shared metrics and accountability
is another critical area. But the four initiatives discussed here have
two critical qualities that recommend them highly. First, they are all
(or should be) practical corporate-level priorities for success that
can only work with greater marketing-sales collaboration. Second, they
each have the added advantage of being able to generate near-term sales
results while strengthening the foundation for longer-term sustainable
growth.
Rob Leavitt
For more on how to improve the alignment between marketing and sales,
register for ITSMA's September 19 Web Briefing, Marketing
and Sales: A New Integration.

[TOP OF
PAGE]
The
Interview
Creating Community: An Interview with Communispace's Siobhan Dullea
As buyers continue to tune out traditional marketing efforts and
spend more and more time online, marketers are being called on to overhaul
their approach to connecting with customers and prospects. Online communities
are emerging as a powerful new way to make those connections, and ITSMA
recently sat down with Siobhan Dullea, vice president of Community
Consulting at Communispace Corporation,
a company that builds and runs private online customer communities,
to get the inside story on how BtoB firms can leverage this new approach.
ITSMA: Over the last couple of years, we've seen a
huge number of companies look to build more interactive relationships
with customers. What are the advantages to cultivating these relationships
online rather than in person?
Dullea: Face-to-face meetings are obviously tremendously powerful,
but they're limited by time and numbers. Now, if you could have a room
full of 300 customers just down the hall from you and you could pop in
there anytime you wanted to ask them questions, get advice, or even just
be a fly on the wall, at all times you would have a bird's eye view on
what customers want. There would be no more second guessing about what
new products or services customers want, or what people think about your
competition, or where and how to attract new customers. The people in
the community would tell you directly and with insightful color commentary.
That's what an online community can give you: continuous customer feedback,
seven days a week, 24 hours a day.
ITSMA: The idea of being a "fly on the wall" is intriguing.
Tell us more about that.
Dullea: Members of online communities aren't bound by the sponsoring
company's agenda in the same way that customers at an event would be.
They're free to talk about anything they'd like, both with the sponsoring
company and with each other. How members talk to each other about how
an issue or product can be incredibly revealing, and so is how customers
influence one another. Within 24 hours of launching one BtoB community,
there were 11 different dialogue topics under way, and only four of those
had been seeded by the community facilitators. The rest were created
by customers around issues they care about. Fifty people had already
added brainstorming ideas, and over 70 people had answered surveys.
Some of the best lessons come from hearing customers talk about those
things that annoy, disappoint, or outrage them. We encourage people to
give the good, bad, and ugly. This gives the sponsoring company valuable
insights into what's really on customers' minds, not just insight into
the issues they think are important to their customers.
ITSMA: There are clearly numerous benefits for the
sponsoring companies, but what makes participation in a branded online
community attractive to the customer members?
Dullea: Different people are motivated by different things. Some
people like the sense of empowerment that comes with having a voice;
others appreciate the opportunity to discuss interesting topics with
people who have similar interests, roles, or responsibilities. Sometimes
sponsoring companies do offer tangible incentives to encourage participation.
We've found that when you ask people to help you figure out a particular
problem because you value their advice—versus asking for general
input or feedback —they will go to extraordinary lengths to help
you. We’ve also observed that when customers feel like part of
an exclusive, valued club of advisors, they will work harder on your
behalf.
ITSMA: I can imagine that some companies are more successful
than others at building relationships through these communities. Is
there a defining trait that contributes to their success?
Dullea: There are two defining traits. One, companies view their
communities as an ongoing, strategic marketing operation, not a campaign
or research project. The second is that they view people in the community
like company insiders and advisors. They tell community members how the
company is using their ideas. They share their candid perspectives on
the industry. They are open, friendly, and respectful. If you treat people
like advisors, they will not only help you for very little compensation,
they will become your advocates with other customers and prospects. Reciprocity
rules.
ITSMA: We tend to hear about more of these types of
initiatives in the BtoC space than in the BtoB world. Why do you think
BtoC companies are leading the charge here?
Dullea: I think that BtoB companies have long felt that they
have data about their customers and the market, and many rely exclusively
on data. But given today's competitive pressures, BtoB companies are
recognizing that the data is no longer enough.
We have one BtoB technology client that is realizing a big increase
in customer loyalty and advocacy thanks to its community initiative.
They're asking their customers for input on everything from the user
interface on the Web to the shipping process, and then they're acting
on that input, which is essential to demonstrating that you listen to
your customers and value their input.
For more on how to leverage online communities at your company, join
us for ITSMA's September 21 Workshop, Blogs
and Beyond: Marketing in the New Digital Channels. The workshop
will feature a panel of digital marketing experts, including Siobhan,
who will help you build a digital marketing plan that incorporates
the best of blogging, RSS, online communities, microsites, podcasting,
wikis, and more. Register at http://www.itsma.com/events/event_desc/06WS06N17.htm
To read more from Communispace, register to download a recent whitepaper, "What
Customers Gain from Listening" from the Communispace site.

[TOP
OF PAGE]
On the Job: Avaya's Customer Councils:
Achieving C-Level Success
In 2003, Avaya faced a dilemma that often strikes technology firms as
they hit their stride: Many of its customers were making the shift from
commodity buyers of telephone equipment to strategic buyers of communications
solutions. With nearly 1 million customers worldwide, including most
of the Fortune 500, Avaya found itself with many strategic buyers yet
few truly strategic customer relationships.
To build deep and meaningful relationships with executive buyers and
influencers, the company stepped out of its product- and technology-centered
comfort zone and launched a ground-breaking customer council program
for the senior-most executives of Avaya’s most strategic customers.
The program has enabled Avaya to hold meaningful dialogues with its customers
on three main topics:
- Customers' fundamental business challenges
- Avaya's strategic roadmap
- Ways to use technology (including but not limited to Avaya's) to
move the industry forward
The council program has served to improve Avaya's relationships with
key customers and position the company as a thought leader on important
industry issues.
Building the Council Program
With the help of strategic marketing partner Tapestry Networks, a specialist
in the emerging arena of leadership networks and peer-to-peer dialogue,
Avaya quickly got to work on the first of its councils—the Executive
Advisory Council (EAC). The goal was to build networked, many-to-many
relationships with a group of noncompeting (but otherwise similar) customers
who would see each other as peers—and who would have as much to
say to Avaya, individually and collectively, as Avaya might say to them.
To ensure that the level of dialogue was as effective and mutually beneficial
as Avaya hoped, the team applied several core principles as they developed
their council model:
- Ensure that participants belong together around the same table. “Even
if it’s your favorite customer," Sharon Watkinson, senior manager
of global marketing at Avaya, warns, "if it’s not good for the
group, if they’re not genuine peers, you won’t have the
right dynamic.”
- Engage market leaders around a broad, strategic theme. Members
of the EAC are CIOs or equivalent executives from market leaders in
diverse industries—companies earning an average of $30 billion
in annual revenue. The organizing theme was broad, inviting members
to explore with Avaya the challenges and opportunities of converged
communications across the enterprise.
- Achieve critical mass with the right number of participants—but
no more. “At any particular meeting, we try to keep it
to no more than 15 customers—and usually seven to eight Avaya
executives,” Watkinson explains. “The ability to have
an intimate discussion dwindles after you’re above about 25
people.”
- Insist on personal commitment from all participants. Council
members make a personal commitment to attend network meetings, which
are held once every six to nine months. They cannot send substitutes.
As the EAC’s host, Avaya's Chairman and CEO has led by example—to
date, he has never missed a council event. Thanks to this commitment,
each discussion builds on the previous one, and relationships develop
among the participating customers as well as with senior Avaya executives.
- Establish explicit ground rules to foster trust and frank discussion. Council
meetings at Avaya operate under a modified Chatham House Rule so that
comments and insights from the council discussions can be shared freely
with the outside world but never attributed to a particular member.
In addition, Avaya is very clear about the fact that council meetings
are never an appropriate place for a sales conversation.
Beyond these best practices, Avaya has found that demonstrating accountability
to council members is central to the program. According to Nancy Maluso,
Avaya’s global marketing director, who is responsible for driving
key lessons from the council meetings throughout the organization, “We
can now track key inputs from these customers and see what we did with
them—did we shape our business strategically?—and sometimes
we find out we didn’t do enough. Because we made a commitment to
report back to customers, we do a report card on ourselves.”
Beyond the Councils
With the councils as the foundation, Avaya has built an executive relationship
management (ERM) program to reach beyond the set of customer leaders
engaged in the councils themselves. These ERM programs include an executive
sponsorship program that pairs Avaya executives with select customer
executives and an executive forum program that organizes educational
events for larger groups of customers. For both of these customer programs,
the Avaya councils have functioned as powerful “content engines,” generating
valuable thought leadership, marketing, and sales-support materials.
“The most important outcome our customer programs have created
is an avenue for our executives to learn from our customers without there
being a sales or service issue involved,” Maluso concludes. “It
enables them to keep the marketplace up front in their mind as they develop
their business. Culturally, it brings the customer closer to our organization,” keeping
Avaya relevant, top-of-mind, and a true strategic partner.
—John DeWitt and Meghann Grandy, info@itsma.com
For more on Avaya’s council program, see out latest Case Study, Avaya’s
High-Impact Customer Councils.

[TOP
OF PAGE]
EuroNotes: A Farewell Message from
Bev Burgess
Over the past five years at ITSMA Europe, I have seen a number of important
changes take place in the market for technology services. Broadly, customers
now want suppliers to solve their business problems, they involve more
people in buying decisions and supplier selection, they take longer over
those decisions, and they want to work with proactive partners who understand
their business and where it needs to go in future. Of course, the extent
to which these things are true varies by customer segment and by culture,
as we have seen repeatedly in our research into "How Customers Choose."
The choice facing these customers is also greater today, with many new
entrants queuing up to meet their technology needs and many traditional
suppliers building capability or acquiring skills to offer a broader
range of services and solutions more consistently across the European
geography. The battle for customers’ business, particularly the
larger, multiyear deals that feed the engine of many IT services companies,
is becoming fiercer. A more focused and targeted approach is being considered
by almost all suppliers, with traditional marketing techniques such as
segmentation increasing in importance and newer techniques such as account-based
marketing becoming more widespread.
In my view, the role of the marketer has never been more important.
We help our companies think from the outside in, we drive better strategy
through fact-based tools and techniques, and we tell each company’s
story in a way that few other people can. Many of the marketers I’ve
met in Europe over the past five years are pulled in so many ways—on
one hand, to deliver tactical results within the next quarter, and on
the other hand, to build a strong and differentiated company for the
future. Yet most are managing to do these things with increasing sophistication
and are adding huge value to the companies they work for.
This is my last EuroNotes as I step down from my position as
managing director of ITSMA in Europe, and so I want to congratulate all
the European marketers I’ve had the pleasure to work with over
the past five years for the progress they have made and the value they
deliver. You have made my job an interesting and enjoyable one, and I
want to thank you all and wish you the best for your future.
And finally, please remember, if the job was easy, you probably wouldn’t
want to be doing it anyway!
—Bev Burgess

[TOP OF PAGE]
Moving to Solutions: Measuring
Solutions Value: Is It a Headache for You, Too?
If you've read any research lately around the value of IT, you know
that one message repeats itself again and again: Measuring the value
of technology is no easy task! Recent research from Ziff Davis confirms
ITSMA's own research—only a handful of technology providers are
measuring the value that their products, services, and solutions deliver,
and customer skepticism around the vendor-provided metrics remains high.
When it comes to solutions, the measurement issue is muddied even more
by the complexity of solutions, the longer sales cycles involved, and
the number of people who participate in the purchase decision.
ITSMA recently interviewed members of our Solutions
Council and discovered that even these companies, which are leading
the charge for solutions, are faced with myriad challenges in this
area. For instance, most members' companies have yet to establish a
formal process to measure solutions value. This problem is exacerbated
by the fact that there is no clear owner of value measurement.
Another major challenge to measuring the value of solutions is that
most vendors usually don't even try to measure value unless a client
specifically requests it. This is partly due to the high cost associated
with the process, which most solutions providers are incurring on their
own, and also to the complexity, tools, and time associated with value
measurement.
So, what's the answer? We're still trying to figure it out! But we do
know that running away from measuring the value provided by solutions
is not the answer. Might clients be willing to collaborate (and maybe
even share the costs!) with their solutions providers around the measurement
issue in order to get their providers' help in justifying their internal
case? Might it be that measuring value is not worthwhile for all solutions,
just the more complex ones? Stay tuned as we explore this issue and the
roles and responsibilities of the parties involved in more detail. In
the meantime, maybe an aspirin would help!
—Adnelly Reyes-Colberg, areyes@itsma.com

[TOP
OF PAGE]
Research Desk
Delving into Differentiation
The only way to avoid being seen as a commodity provider in today's
market is to offer something distinctive from the competition. Not surprisingly,
therefore, differentiation is one of the top marketing priorities identified
by ITSMA members, with substantial energy devoted to creating value propositions,
collateral, events, internal education, and other activities to help
their companies and offerings stand out from the crowd.
Despite the time and money invested, however, it is a rare services
firm that really does stand out. To help you avoid the trap of "me too" marketing,
ITSMA has identified three types of differentiators, which are outlined
below:
- Unique differentiators. Unique differentiators are very desirable.
They create a gap between the firm and its competition that is very
difficult to close, at least in the short term. Unique differentiators
may create a totally new type of company, service or solution offering,
or delivery or payment model. These characteristics are not shared
by any other company.
- Differentiators by degree. These differentiators relate to
amount, number, or size, such as lower prices, higher customer satisfaction,
more consultants trained in a particular technology, faster response
time, and so forth. They are not as powerful as unique differentiators,
but they are easier to create. This type of difference is also more
easily copied by competitors, which means that the competitive gap
can be closed more quickly.
- Faux differentiators. Faux differentiators do not actually
confer a real competitive advantage. For technology services and solutions,
they include characteristics that customers either do not notice or
assume that everyone has, such as sound financial management, superior
management, or general technology expertise.
Although unique differentiators are the most coveted, not all of a provider's
differentiators can be unique. In reality, companies need to think of
their differentiators in terms of a portfolio to be managed. There should
be a mix. Marketers should aim to identify at least one or two attributes
or features that are unique and then look to support those unique differentiators
with some additional differentiators by degree.
—Julie Schwartz, jschwartz@itsma.com
For more on the different types of differentiators as well as an
exploration of what makes differentiators "real" vs. "perceived," see
ITSMA's new Differentiation
Audit Tool.
For more on differentiation, see out latest briefing, Meeting
the Differentiation Challenge: Competitive Positioning in a Converging
World.
| Visit ITSMA's Online Research Library for a
complete listing of publications on moving from products and services
to solutions, strengthening brand differentiation, empowering the
sales system, leveraging partners, improving customer loyalty,
justifying marketing investment, and other critical marketing and
sales challenges: http://www.itsma.com/onlinelib.asp. |

[TOP OF PAGE]
Upcoming Events
Lessons From Other Industries – What Can We Learn From Investment
Banks, Airlines, And Construction?
September 13 Inner Circle Meeting
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06RT09E24.htm
Marketing and Sales: A New Partnership
September 19 Web Briefing
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06OB09G25.htm
Blogs and Beyond: Marketing in the New Digital Channels
September 21 Workshop (Boston, MA)
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06WS06N17.htm
Growing the Business with Micro- and Account-Based Marketing
September 26 Lunch Briefing (Santa Clara, CA)
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06BB09N26.htm
Placing Your Bets: Marketing Investment Priorities and Trade-offs
September 27 Executive Roundtable (Santa Clara, CA)
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06RT09N27.htm
ITSMA's 2006 Marketing Conference
Driving Value: Marketing's Emerging Role
November 15-16 Conference (Cambridge, MA)
http://www.itsma.com/Events/event_desc/06AC11N31.htm
Complete Events Calendar
Ask ITSMA!
Do you have a services marketing question?
Visit Ask ITSMA to access
our experience, insight, and research results.
(c) Copyright 2006, ITSMA
Please forward this newsletter, but only in its entirety.
Public citation or publication of any information herein is encouraged
but subject to U.S. and international copyright law and conventions. Any
citation must include full attribution to ITSMA. Individual graphics or
paragraphs can be published without permission as long as attribution
to ITSMA is included. Publication of longer selections or complete articles
requires ITSMA permission. For permission or more information, contact
pr@itsma.com.

[TOP
OF PAGE]
Subscription Information
ITSMA E-ZINE is a monthly email newsletter that provides
highlights of new ITSMA research, analysis, ideas, tools, and events relating
to marketing and selling technology services and solutions. ITSMA
E-ZINE is available without charge and is sent only to opt-in subscribers.
Subscriptions are available in text and HTML versions. To SUBSCRIBE or
to change the format of your subscription, visit http://www.itsma.com/aspfiles/press/ezine.asp.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email us at unsubscribe@itsma.com or mail us at ITSMA
Subscriptions, 420 Bedford Street, Suite 110, Lexington, MA 02420, USA.
Back issues of ITSMA E-ZINE are available at http://www.itsma.com/News/ezine/default.htm.
|